Filedot Model Page

A platform cannot ban you if your identity is a file you control. It can refuse to accept your dot’s claims, but it cannot delete your identity. You simply take your dot to another platform. This transforms content moderation from an existential threat (deplatforming) into a contractual disagreement (rejection of a specific transaction). VI. Criticisms and Open Problems No model is without challenges. Critics of the Filedot Model raise three substantial objections.

Because references are cryptographic hashes, the resulting graph is and content-addressable . This is the Filedot Model’s answer to the blockchain’s distributed ledger but without global consensus overhead. You do not need every node to agree on history; you only need each dot to carry its own provenance. filedot model

Authentication becomes possession of a dot and proof of control over its private key. No more “forgot password” flows. No more credential stuffing. Your dot’s private key (stored in a hardware wallet or a secure enclave) signs challenges from services. This is public-key infrastructure reborn, but with the crucial difference that the public key is derived from the dot’s content, not from a certificate authority’s ledger. A platform cannot ban you if your identity