Yet his relevance today is arguably greater than ever. In a time when young Muslims are leaving religion because they are told they must choose between a literalist reading of the Qur’an (where mountains are pegs) and atheistic materialism, Kamal offers a . He argues that one can be fully committed to the scientific method—with all its fallibility, historicity, and provisionality—and fully committed to the Qur’an as divine revelation, provided one reads nature and text as two books written by the same Author, in two different languages: one of quantitative law, the other of qualitative meaning.
Thus, scientific tafsir, for Kamal, is the act of reading the Ayat al-Takwiniyya (cosmic verses) with the same hermeneutic rigor as the Ayat al-Tashri’iyya (legal verses). Both require ijtihad (independent reasoning). The scientist is the mujtahid of nature. Here is where Kamal departs most radically from mainstream i’jaz writers. He was deeply suspicious of literalism. For example, when the Qur’an describes the heavens as a “roof” (21:32) or the sun setting in a muddy spring (18:86), the i’jaz writer contorts physics to fit the literal. Kamal, drawing on his existentialist training (he was a scholar of Heidegger and Sartre), insisted on symbolic hermeneutics . scientific tafsir zakaria kamal
For Zakaria Kamal, the deepest act of scientific tafsir was not to find a verse predicting the Big Bang. It was to look through a telescope and, in that very act of measurement and calculation, perform a silent dhikr . The scientist, when honest, is a theologian of the concrete. And the Qur’an, when read philosophically, is the manual for that theology. Yet his relevance today is arguably greater than ever